Skip to content

LLM and MCP

Explain

1. What is a Large Language Model (LLM)?

Aspect Key points
Definition An LLM is a neural-network language model trained—largely with self-supervision—on trillions of tokens so it can predict the next token in a sequence. The dominant family today are generative-pre-trained transformers (GPT-type) models. (en.wikipedia.org)
How it works ① Transformer layers use self-attention to weigh every token against every other token, letting the model capture long-range dependencies. ② During pre-training it learns statistical patterns of language; during in-context learning it follows instructions or solves tasks given in the prompt. (techradar.com)
Scale & “Chinchilla” law Empirical scaling laws show that performance improves roughly as a power law with respect to parameter count, training tokens, and compute—hence today’s multi-hundred-billion-parameter systems. (en.wikipedia.org)
Typical capabilities Text generation, summarization, classification, information extraction, code completion, multi-modal reasoning (when fine-tuned with images/audio), and tool invocation (“function calling”).
Strengths Few-shot adaptability, broad world knowledge, multilingual ability, rapid deployment via APIs rather than bespoke ML pipelines.
Limitations • “Hallucination” (confident but false statements) • Training-data bias • High inference cost and latency • Context-window limits • Need for guard-rails and alignment techniques such as RLHF or constitutional AI. (en.wikipedia.org, arxiv.org)

2. What is the Model Context Protocol (MCP)?

Aspect Key points
Purpose MCP is an open, JSON-RPC 2.0–based application-layer protocol that standardises how LLMs (or “agent” clients) request structured context and execute tool calls against external systems—databases, SaaS APIs, local files, code repos, etc. Think of it as “USB-C for AI apps.” (en.wikipedia.org, arstechnica.com)
Origins & Timeline Introduced by Anthropic in Nov 25 2024 and open-sourced the same day; since March–April 2025 OpenAI, Google, and Microsoft have officially announced support, making it the de-facto industry standard for agentic integrations. (theverge.com, techcrunch.com, techcrunch.com)
Core components • MCP Client (usually the LLM runtime or an orchestrator library) sends JSON-RPC requests such as list_tools, call_tool, or get_context.
• MCP Server wraps the data/tool source and returns context chunks, tool manifests, or results.
• Schema: all messages follow a versioned JSON schema with explicit auth scopes and token budgeting metadata. (en.wikipedia.org)
Typical workflow 1️⃣ LLM receives a user prompt (“Summarise this policy PDF”). 2️⃣ It calls list_tools; the server advertises a “file-reader” tool. 3️⃣ LLM issues call_tool with the file path, gets the text back, and produces the answer—all inside one conversational turn.
Benefits Uniformity (one integration covers many models), security (fine-grained permissions instead of full file-system access), streamlined agent chaining (the same protocol passes intermediate results between multiple specialised tools), and ecosystem momentum (SDKs in Python, TypeScript, Rust).
Challenges • Still evolving spec (v0.6 as of June 2025) • Governance and version-compatibility • Need for robust auth/secret management • Potential vendor-specific extensions if not carefully standardised.

3. How LLM + MCP fit together

  1. LLM alone is great at reasoning over the text you give it, but it’s stateless and blind to private data or live systems.
  2. MCP bridges that gap—the model can now pull “context blocks” or trigger functions in a consistent, auditable way.

  3. This unlocks agentic patterns such as:

  4. Customer-support bots that pull order data from an ERP via an MCP server.

  5. Programming copilots that read current project files, run unit tests, and commit code.
  6. Knowledge workers letting the assistant query DuckDB, generate a chart, then draft a summary email—all mediated through one protocol stack.

4. Why it matters to practitioners

For developers → write one MCP wrapper around your data/tool and instantly make it accessible to multiple LLM vendors; avoid bespoke plug-ins. For companies → enforce consistent governance: every tool call is logged, permissioned, and revocable. For researchers → simplifies benchmarking of tool-augmented reasoning by abstracting away bespoke glue code.

In short, LLMs supply the reasoning engine; MCP supplies the safe connector. Together they enable the next wave of AI systems that don’t just talk about helping—you can let them act on your real data with confidence.